Control confidence
92.4%
+4.8 pts this quarter
GRC DecisionGraph
Evidence → risk → economics → decision
Executive assurance workspace · 07 Sep 2026
Decisions backed by control evidence and economic consequence.
A traceable operating view for GRC leaders, control owners, auditors and executives. Unknown evidence remains unknown; modeled value never becomes recognized value without confirmation.
P50 cyber exposure
$4.16M
$1.02M reducible
Verified annual value
$684K
Finance-ready ledger
GRC-blocked pipeline
$3.20M
3 priority opportunities
Board decision queue
Material choices awaiting action
3 of 11 scenarios exceed escalation thresholds
Above toleranceConfidence 82%
Privileged production access
Accountable owner · Identity Security
Current P50 exposure
$1.84M
After remediation
$540K
Recommended decision
Fund targeted remediation
Framework assurance
Evidence coverage
Cross-mapping is separated from evidence qualification. One mapped requirement does not imply that its evidence is fresh, complete or accepted.
SOC 296% qualified
ISO 2700191% qualified
ISO 4200178% qualified
PCI DSS88% qualified
150+ framework integration plane
Designed to consume the OSS CISO Assistant framework catalog and qualify reusable evidence through the a2zsoc.com hosted plane.
Cross-mapping without false equivalence
150+ frameworks, one qualified evidence plane.
The integration contract can ingest the 150+ governance, risk, privacy, security and AI frameworks listed by OSS CISO Assistant. GRC DecisionGraph preserves the upstream framework identity and version, then applies reviewed, directional cross-mappings and evidence qualification on the a2zsoc.com hosted plane.
Framework catalog
150+
CISO Assistant integration-ready
Mapping modes
4
Exact · substantial · partial · related
Evidence gates
5
Provenance · integrity · freshness · scope · relevance
Transitive claims
0
Never inferred without review
| Source requirement | Target requirement | Strength | Coverage | Evidence state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 · CC6.1 | ISO 27001 · A.5.15 | Substantial | 85% | Qualified |
| SOC 2 · CC7.2 | ISO 27001 · A.8.16 | Substantial | 90% | Qualified |
| ISO 42001 · A.6.2.6 | NIST AI RMF · MEASURE 2 | Partial | 68% | Review due |
| PCI DSS · 10.2 | NIST 800-53 · AU-2 | Related | 61% | Scope gap |
Evaluation & evolution engineering
Two loops, one controlled release path
EVALUATION LOOP
1Collect signed evidence
2Qualify five evidence dimensions
3Evaluate control verdict
4Quantify loss and uncertainty
5Compare predicted vs actual
EVOLUTION LOOP
1Classify root cause
2Rank risk-adjusted value
3Test offline regression suite
4Canary controlled change
5Approve, revise or roll back
Agents may recommend changes. They cannot approve material controls, risk acceptance, external assurance or revenue attribution.
Evidence qualification
One receipt, five independent gates
Provenance
PASS
aws-iam-adapter@1.2.0
Integrity
PASS
SHA-256 receipt reproduced
Freshness
PASS
Valid for 17h 42m
Scope
FAIL
Payments account absent
Relevance
PASS
Objective directly supported
Control result: FAIL. Four passing gates cannot compensate for missing required scope.
Unit economics ledger
Recognized value is narrower than possible value.
Synthetic reference case. Capacity and unconfirmed attribution are visible but excluded from ROI.
Labor savings
$123,750
Recognized
Confirmed direct revenue
$420,000
Recognized
Validated loss reduction
$180,000
Recognized
Contributory pipeline
$900,000
Excluded
Capacity pipeline
$3.20M
Excluded
01
Evidence sources
AWS, Kubernetes, Vanta, Linear, Elastic and VictoriaLogs remain replaceable inputs.
02
Decision graph
Controls, risks, obligations, owners, customers and evidence retain explicit lineage.
03
Governed agents
Cited recommendations are evaluated before any material human decision.
04
Business outcomes
Board choices and priority-contract impact reconcile to the value ledger.